Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7519 (GAU)

JYOTISH CHANDRA NARZARY v. BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/820/2025 · 2025-02-16

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010030742025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/820/2025 JYOTISH CHANDRA NARZARY S/O- LATE MUKUL CHANDRA NARZARY, R/O- JABANGPAR, P.S. NAOKATA, P.S. GORESWAR, DIST. TAMULPUR (BTC), ASSAM, PIN- 781366. VERSUS BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, BTC, BADOFA NWGAR, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BTC BADOFA NWGAR DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BAKSA MUSHALPUR DIST. BAKSA (BTC) ASSAM PIN- 781367. 4:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER TAMULPUR DIST. TAMULPUR (BTC) ASSAM PIN- 781367. 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M SARANIA, MR. P P GOGOI,MR A SARANIA,MR R.BEZBARUAH,N GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, GA, ASSAM,SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 17.02.2025 Mr. N. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh. Mr. P. Nayak, learned counsel appears for the respondent nos.1 to 4, while Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel appears for the respondent no.5. The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant