Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75181 (PNJ)

MANDEEP TOKHI v. HARJINDER SINGH AND ORS

FAO/1857/2016 · 2025-08-22

Lok Adalat Bench

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.1 502 FAO-1857-2016 MANDEEP TOKHI V/S HARJINDER SINGH AND ORS Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate and Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate for Mr. PHS Pannu, Advocate for the Insurance Company. *** Since none had been appearing on behalf of the appellant, notice was issued to him to appear in person before this Forum to explore the possibility of settlement. However, the report indicates that the appellant has left the given address. Accordingly, in the absence of both the appellant and his counsel, the matter cannot be settled in the Lok Adalat and is, therefore, consigned to the record room, with liberty to the appellant to revive the same by filing an appropriate application before this Forum, if the need so arises. A copy of this order be sent to the appellant at the address as well as to his counsel, so that he could take appropriate steps to contact his client for revival of the same. (J.C. VERMA) PRESIDENT 22.08.2025 (ARVIND KUMAR) Atul MEMBER ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2025.09.09 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document