Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7518 (UTT)

VARUN PRAMOD KUMAR BAGLA AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/592/2025 · 2025-06-23

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.592 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Vikas Pande and Mr. Amit Kapri, Advocates for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. By means of the writ petition, the petitioners have put to challenge the F.I.R. No.48 of 2025 dated 07.02.2025, under Sections 308(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 351(3), 352 and 61(2) of B.N.S. 2023 registered at Police Station Dehradun, District Dehradun. 4. On the date when the matter was argued afresh counsel for the petitioners expressed that the parties may have entered into compromise and proposed investigation could have been concluded on submission of the final report. 5. At the submission of counsel for the petitioners, this Court directed State to seek instructions in the matter for today i.e., 23.06.2025 and listed the matter as fresh. 6. Today State counsel, on instructions, submitted that the parties have entered into a settlement and in view of settlement and compromise arrived at between the parties, the final report has been submitted on 18.06.2025. 7. In view of submission made by State counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 8. Accordingly writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 23.06.2025 SK