SRI KRISHNAMURTHY v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/107/2024 · 2025-11-26
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75153 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75153 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48976 MSA No. 107 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 107 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN:
SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O GUNDAPPAA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O SIRIVARA VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAUKRU TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE TUMAKURU - 572 101
2.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE TUMAUKRU - 572 101 …RESPONDENTS
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.03.2019 PASSED IN RA NO.180/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.11.2015 PASSED IN LAC.110/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE REFERENCE FILED UNDER 18 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48976 MSA No. 107 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation.
2.
Order sheet dated 19.11.2025 reads as under:
" Sri. Mohan Kumar T., learned counsel submits that his name be shown along with Sri. Govindaraju,
learned counsel in the cause list. List finally as a last chance, on 26.11.2025. In the mean time, office objections shall be complied with."
3. The matter is listed for sixth time for compliance of office objections. Still, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
PNV - CT:VS - List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13