Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36041 CRL.P No. 11421 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11421 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1. MR. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O MR. NAGARAJ R/A NEAR ANJANAYA SWAMY TEMPLE 1ST CROSS, ITI LAYOUT A. NARAYANAPURA DOORAVANINAGAR BENGALURU - 560016. 2. MR. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATARAMYA R/AT NO. 207, ITI LAYOUT A NARAYANAPURA, DOORAVANINAGAR BENGALURU - 560016. 3. MR.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS S/O MR.MUNIYAPPA R/A NO.9, NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL A. NARAYANAPURA, DOORAVANINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 016. 4. MR. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O MR.NANJAPPA R/A NO.15 NEAR VENKATESHWARASWAMY TEMPLE A NARAYANAPURA
Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36041 CRL.P No. 11421 of 2025
DOORAVANINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 016
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRA SHEKARA .K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PSI MAHADEVAPURA PS REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 01. 2. UMASHANKAR S/O. LATE SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.72, SHIVAPPA HOUSE NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL A. NARAYANAPURA BENGALURU - 560016. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
V/O/D 08.09.2025, NOTICE TO R2 IS DEFERRED)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C (FILED U/S.528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.70496/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ACJM BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 325, 506, 504, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 384, 307, 323, 324 AND 354 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36041 CRL.P No. 11421 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Though learned Senior Counsel referring to the charge sheet materials tried to persuade this Court that there are absolutely no materials to proceed against accused Nos.2 to 4 and 7, however, the learned HCGP countering his submission would refer to the particulars of charge sheet materials indicating that there are some materials to proceed against the petitioners. 2. At this juncture, when this Court was not inclined to grant indulgence, learned Senior Counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition and liberty is sought to file discharge application. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2