Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75120 (KAR)

LILY REALTY PVT LTD v. UMESH K PATEL

WP/20658/2023 · 2025-08-14

Anu Sivaraman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32741 WP No. 20658 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WRIT PETITION NO. 20658 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: LILY REALTY PVT. LTD. COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING OFFICE ADDRESS AT: No.17, BHATTARAHALLI OLD MADRAS ROAD K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560 049 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RAJU M. MANAGER LEGAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIKARA P.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UMESH K. PATEL S/O KHUSHAL PATEL AGED MAJOR 2. NEETA U. PATEL W/O UMESH K. PATEL AGED MAJOR 3. NEELESH K. PATEL S/O KHASIML PATEL AGED MAJOR 4. NEHA N. PATEL S/O NEELESH K PATEL AGED MAJOR Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32741 WP No. 20658 of 2023 RESPONDENTS No.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT No.6, SERVICE ROAD BEHIND ATTIGUPPE BUS STOP HAMPI NAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 104 5. KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK 3RD CROSS ROAD, CSI COMPOUND MISSION ROAD, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION OF THE LIKE NATURE TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.07.2023 PASSED BY THE R-5 IN CMP/00136/2023 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32741 WP No. 20658 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the RERA Complaint itself has been disposed of and that nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The said submission is recorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1