IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2613 of 2025 Decided on: 25.02.2025 M/s Saboo Tor Pvt. Limited … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for respondent No. 1. : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When the case was taken up for consideration and learned Counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the factum of the petitioner having not exhausted the statutory remedy, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw present writ petition, with liberty to avail the statutory remedy. 2. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be protected for a week and till the petitioner invokes the alternative mechanism, no coercive action be taken against it by the respondents-Electricity Board. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. On the prayer so made, it is observed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till 04.03.2025 so that the petitioner in the meanwhile can approach the statutory authority to avail the remedy available to him by the said date. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 25, 2025 (narender)