APHC010075982020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4497/2020 Between: 1. K.RAMESH REDDY, S/O. SAMBASIVA REDDY, AGE 44 YEARS, P. ANANTHAURAM POST AND VILLAGE, KONDAPURAMU (R.S) YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR-522002. 2. THE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, P.V.S.EMPIRE, TADEPALLI-522501. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MPDO, , KONDAPURAMU, KONDAPURAMU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, KONDAPURAMU, KONDAPURAMU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. THE P ANANTHAPURAMU GRAM PANCHAYATI, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. KONDAPURAMU, 2 KONDAPURAMU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. THE S THIMMAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KONDAPURAMU, KONDAPURAMU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declaring the action of the 2'd respondent in changing the location of Village Secretariat from 7th respondent Grampanchayat to 8th respondent Grarnpanchayat by its proceedings No.751/CPRandRD/S/2019, dated 10.02.202) is contrary to the Memo issued by the 2nd resident in Circular Memo i75/CRPandRD/S/2019 dated 29.06.2019 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings dated 10.02.2020 passed in No.751/CPRandRD/S/ 2019, dated 10.02.2020 by the 2nd respondent in respect of 8th respondent, pending disposal of above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4497/2020 ORDER: Heard Ms.J.Anjani Priya, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.J.Anjani Priya, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.09.2025 TTPPSS 4 81 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4497/2020 02.09.2025 TTPPSS