- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43060 WP No. 3602 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.3602 OF 2023 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ESTHER SHEELA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O M JESU, R/AT NO 566, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 13TH CROSS, B M SRINAGAR, MYSURU, NOW R/AT NO 173, OLD POLICE STATION ROAD, METAGALLI POST, MYSURU - 570016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE CTI BUILDING SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43060 WP No. 3602 of 2023 MYSURU - 570001. 3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, NO 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 4. THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY K I A D B ZONAL OFFICE, K R S ROAD, METAGALLI POSTY, MYSURU - 570016. 5. THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER K I A D B ZONAL OFFICE, K R S ROAD, METAGALLI POSTY, MYSURU - 570016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. B.S. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3-KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BY ITS SECRETARY- RESPONDENT NO.4, THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, KIADB AND RESPONDENT NO.5, THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KIADB TO CONSIDER HER REPRESENTATION DATED 20.07.2022, MADE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43060 WP No. 3602 of 2023 TO THE RESPONDENT NO.3, REPRESENTATION DATED 08.02.2022 MADE TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AND REPRSENTATION DATED 06.05.2022, MADE TO THE RESPONDENT NO.5 AND PERMIT HER TO DEPOSIT THE BALANCE AMOUNT AND ALLOT THE SAME SITE, AND IF IT IS NOT AVAILABLE TO ALLOT THE SAME SITE ALLOCATE ANY OTHER SITE IN THE SAME LOCALITY. THE TRUE COPIES OF THE SAID REPRESENTATION MADE TO RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 5 ARE PRODUCED THE SAME AT ANNEXURE-A TO C RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the representation made by the petitioner with regard to allotment of site. 3. Having Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and by looking into the representation dated 20.07.2022, (Annexure-A), wherein it is forthcoming that - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43060 WP No. 3602 of 2023 the allotment of site made in favour of petitioner has been cancelled and allotted to third parties. In this regard, learned counsel Sri. B. S. Sudhindra, learned counsel representing respondent- Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (for short, 'KIADB'), submitted that, the allotment of site made in favour of petitioner is cancelled. Therefore, direction to consider the representations produced Annexures- A to C by the respondent-authorities do not arise unless the order of cancellation of allotment of site made by the KIADB is challenged by the petitioner in a manner known to law. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondent-KIADB for redressal of his grievance. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23