Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7509 (MAD)

S.KALAIVANI v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/537/2025 · 2026-06-29

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 537 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 537 of 2025 and WMP Nos.636 to 638 of 2025 S.Kalaivani ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Authorized Officer State Bank Of India, Natrampalli Branch, No.69/1 RCS Main Road, Ramakrishna Math Campus, Natrampalli, Thirupathur District 635852. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent pertaining to sale notice issued under Rule 8(6) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 dated 26.11.2024 and quash the same as illegal, devoid of merits and against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent not to conclude the e-auction sale which is scheduled on 09.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Kishore Kumar ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) None appears for the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 537 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 3 2. The writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent pertaining to sale notice issued under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 dated 26.11.2024 and quash the same as illegal, devoid of merits and against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent not to conclude the e-auction sale which is scheduled on 09.01.2025. 3. The challenge in the writ petition is to the sale notice. It is brought to the notice of this court by learned counsel for the respondent that the sale is concluded and the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN J.) 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssk To The Authorized Officer State Bank Of India, Natrampalli Branch, No.69/1 RCS Main Road, Ramakrishna Math Campus, Natrampalli, Thirupathur District 635852. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 537 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 3 SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J. AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. ssk WP No. 537 of 2025 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis