S.No. 84 Supp. List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP (S ) No. 198/2023 M/S F.M. JOINERY AND FURNITURE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Malik, Advocate vice Mr Shahbaz Sikandar, Advocate Vs. MR. FAZLUL HASEEB AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, AAG with Ms. Shaila Shameem, Advocate CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 05-04-2025 1. In view of consideration order dated 25.03.2025 passed by the Deputy Commissioner Shopian, even though it is not palatable to the petitioner still this contempt petition cannot take the cause of the petitioner any further except to leave the petitioner to resort to appropriate legal course of action which may include filing of a writ petition to assail the consideration order on the known grounds on which a judicial review of an administrative action/decision is admissible to be reviewed. Accordingly, present contempt petition is closed. 2. The closure of this contempt petition shall not be causing any prejudice to the case and cause of the petitioner in the event of any writ petition or any other appropriate legal course of action if resorted to by the petitioner for seeking and earning the so called admitted liability claim from the respondents’ end. 3. Disposed of. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 05-04-2025 Mubashir