YOGESH CHANDRA SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/2191/2025 · 2025-07-15
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114774 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2191 of 2025 Applicant :- Yogesh Chandra Saxena Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Misc. Case No. 798 of 2022, under Section 125(3) CrPC, P.S.- Izzatnagar, District- Bareilly pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly, expeditiously within the stipulated period.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the father of opposite party no.2 and an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been moved by him to get maintenance allowance from his son/ opposite party no.2. It is further submitted that an order to pay Rs.25,000/- to the applicant has already been passed against the opposite party no.2 but only part payment was made so far. It is further submitted that an application under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. was earlier decided by the trial Court vide judgement and order dated 20.4.2022 and the opposite party no.2 was
directed to pay Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance allowance but only part payment was made.
4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record.
5. In these circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case, preferably within a period of one year, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted.
6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.
7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad