NAVEEN BHARDWAJ AND ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
CRM-M/70789/2025 · 2026-07-07
H S Grewal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-70789-2025 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 277 CRM-M-70789-2025 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 NAVEEN BHARDWAJ AND ORS ....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr.Sahil Gupta, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Hemant Hans, Advocate, Mr. Vishavjeet Gill, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 449 Dated 25.11.2025 under Sections 3(5), 309(6), 311 of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station City Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad on the basis of compromise dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned JMIC, Faridabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned JMIC, Faridabad has submitted copy of RENU RAWAT 2026.07.08 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-70789-2025 2 report to the effect that he compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainants have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 449 Dated 25.11.2025 under Sections 3(5), 309(6), 311 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station City Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioner on the basis of compromise dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) subject to payment of Rs. 20,000/- as costs with the High Court Legal Services Committee. 7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 07.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.08 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh