BOKAJAN CEMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 2 ORS
WP(C)/6958/2016 · 2025-10-21
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7503 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7503 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010030092016
2024:GAU-AS:10452
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6958/2016 BOKAJAN CEMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION P.O. BOKAJAN, DIST- KARBI ANGLONG, PIN-782490, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECY., SHRI PRATAP BORAH VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 2 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES, NEW DELHI-1 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM LABOUR and EMPLOYMENT DISPUR GHY-6 3:MANAGEMENT OF BOKAJAN CEMENT FACTORY A UNIT OF CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. BOKAJAN DIST- KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782490 REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGE For the Petitioner(s) : None appears
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Chetia, Government Advocate
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER Date : 22.10.2025
None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call.
2. It is seen that the instant writ petition was earlier dismissed vide an order dated 25.10.2024. Subsequently, this Court vide an
order dated 19.07.2025 restored the instant writ petition.
3. Today when the matter is being taken up, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Considering the above, it appears that the petitioner has not been diligent enough to pursue the present proceedings, for which, the instant writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant