IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67914 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2025 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Suganti Devi son of Brahama Prasad Resident of Village- Fenhara, ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran At chapra 2. Brahama Prasad Son of Late Visharjan Raut Resident of Village- Fenhara, ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran At chapra 3. Pankaj Prasad @ Pankaj Kumar son of Brahama Prasad Resident of Village- Fenhara, ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran At chapra 4. Batisa Kunwar wife of Late Visharjan Raut Resident of Village- Fenhara, ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran At chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 2 having been arrested during pendency of this application, he seeks permission to withdraw this application so far as he is concerned. 3. In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner no. 2 Brahama Prasad is concerned. 4. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67914 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 with Taraiya P.S. Case no. 143 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 5. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons including the petitioners herein are said to have came variously armed with lathi, danda, rod, etc, having abused and thereafter assaulted the son of the brother-in-law of the informant as also the informant causing injuries. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the FIR itself, it would transpire that the parties are neighbours and the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case over a trivial dispute. Further referring to the order of the learned trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. Petitioner nos. 1 and 4 happen to be a 55 year and 80 year old ladies. They have no criminal antecedent. 7. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the petitioner nos. 1 and 4 being ladies, the injuries Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67914 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 having been found to be simple in nature and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case no. 143 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to satisfaction of the learned A.J.M.-XIII, Saran at Chapra. sauravkrsinha/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T