Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75009 (PAT)

Sakindar Mahto @ Sakendra Mahto @ Sakindra Mahto v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./70748/2024 · 2025-01-18

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70748 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sakindar Mahto @ Sakendra Mahto @ Sakindra Mahto, S/o Dhari Mahto, R/o Village - Semra Belwatiya, PS- Turkauliya, District- East Chamaparan, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 327, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence the informant was sitting at his door. At that time the petitioner along with others being armed with lathi, danda, iron rod and farsa arrived there and started assaulting. They started abusing. It is alleged that the petitioner assaulted with farsa on the neck of the informant but he escaped anyhow. After that he assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70748 of 2024(5) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the trial court itself but as he could not surrender within time, he has to file regular bail which was rejected. From perusal of the injury report it transpires that the nature of injury is simple. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- 5th, Motihari in connection with Kodhobari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T