SMT. ASHWINI S TALAWAR v. M/S CHOLAMANDALAM GIC LTD
MFA/2042/2024 · 2025-08-14
Lok Adalath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74994 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74994 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K.V.ARAVIND
&
SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY.H, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 2042/2024 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.6709/2025)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. ASHWINI S. TALAWAR, W/O LATE SHRISHAIL TALAWAR @ SHRISHAIL, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
2.
MR. MANJUNATH SHRISHAIL TALAWAR,
S/O LATE SHRISHAIL TALAWAR @ SHRISHAIL,
AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS.
APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR REP BY
HER APPELLANT AS A NATURAL GUARDIAN
MOTHER 1ST APPELLANT.
3.
SRI. MANTAPPA BASANNA TALAWAR,
S/O BASANNA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
4.
SMT. MALLAMMA W/O MANTAPPA BASANNA TALAWAR, S/O BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
2
ALL ARE R/AT NO.148, SINDGI TALUK, NAGAVI (BK), BIJAPUR, KARNATAKA – 586123.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.GURUDEV PRASAD K. T, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM GIC LTD, BY THE MANAGER, MOTOR CLAIMS HUB, UNIT NO.4, 9TH FLOOR, LEVEL -6, GOLDEN HEIGHTS COMPLEX, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, 4TH ‘M’ BLOCK, S. 59TH ‘C’ CROSS, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010.
2. RAJENDRAN.M.
S/O MUNIYAPPA, NO.3/517/24, MRITUNJA NILAYA, ANBU NAGAR, HOSUR TALUK, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU- 635109.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-1)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.1886/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
3 CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants – Claimants has filed a Memo seeking permission to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. The said Memo is placed on record.
2. Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Draw the award accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
MEMBER SRK*