Gudur Rama Sesha Reddy, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/1230/2023 · 2025-01-08
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7499 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7499 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
' / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI I.A.NOS: 1 AND 2 OF 2024 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1230 OF 2023 Between: Gudur Rama Sesha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 64 years, R/o. Flat No.133/a, Srinilayam, 5th Cross, 28th Main Road, HSR Layout, Sector-I, Bangalore, Karnataka State. (A-2) ...Petitioner/Accused AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its The SHO, Women Police Station, Guntur, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent/Respondent
2. Sanikommu Tulasi Niharika, W/o. Gudur Krishna Sahit Reddy, D/o. Sanikommu Venkata Reddy, Aged about 26 years, R/o. D.No.5-67- 77/A, 4/20 Brodipet, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in C.C.No.11 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise, Guntur, Guntur District., and quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2024 Between: Sanikommu Tulasi Niharika, W/o. Gudur Krishna Sahit Reddy, D/o. Sanikommu Venkata Reddy, Aged about 26 years, R/o. D.No.5-67- 77/A, 4/20 Brodipet, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/2"'^ Respondent/ De-facto Complainant AND
1. Gudur Rama Sesha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 64 R/o. Flat No.133/a, Srinilayam, 5th Cross, 28th Main Road, HSR Layout, Sector-I, Bangalore, Karnataka State. years. ...Respondent/Petitioner/Accused No.2
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its The SHO, Women Police Station, Guntur, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent/Respondent No.1 Petition under Section 528 R/W 359 (2) of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise in
C.C.No.11 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise, Guntur, Guntur District., by quashing the I.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 same. Between: Sanikommu Tulasi Niharika, W/o. Gudur Krishna Sahit Reddy, D/o. Sanikommu Venkata Reddy, Aged about 26 years, R/o. D.No.5-67- 77/A, 4/20 Brodipet, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/2"'^ Respondent/ De-facto Complainant AND
1.
Gudur Rama Sesha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 64 R/o. Flat No.133/a, Srinilayam, 5th Cross, 28th Main Road, HSR Layout, Sector-I, Bangalore, Karnataka State. years. ...Respondent/Petitioner/Accused No.2
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its The SHO, Women Police Station, Guntur, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent/Respondent No.1 Petition under Section 528 R/W 359 (6) of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/2 Respondent/De-facto Complaint to compromise the case with the 1 Respondent/Petitioner/Accused No.2 shall quash C.C.No.11 of 2023 the file of the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise, nd on
Guntur, Guntur District., for the offences under Sections 498(A), 420, 506 323 IPC and Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in the present case. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Dilip Jaya Ram, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Ratan Mohan Medida, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 on The Court made the following COMMON ORDER:
APHC010075982023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI rpiMlNAL PETITION NO: 1230/20^ B#S [3368] THE HONOURABLE SRI Between:
1 GUDUR RAMA SESHA REDDY Apcn ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/0. “Stor^.Tngalor™ «aka state s/0 KRISHNA REDDY, FLAT N0.133/A, HSR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA BY^PUBLIC SCt^^^ ^"H™cSu°Rro^F^%O^H^A-OESH at AMARAVATHl. NIHARIKA, W/0. GUDUR KRISHNA SANIKOMMU VENKATA REDDY R/0. D.NO.5-67-77/A, 4/20 2 SANIKOMMU TULASI SAHIT REDDY ‘ Anpn ABOUT 26 YEARS, BRODIPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTIS); D/0 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S);
1.RATAN MOHAN MEDIDA 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following;
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI lA Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 in/and Criminal Petition No:1230 of 2023 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. (Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/Accused No.2 to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.11 of 2023 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise, Guntur, Guntur District. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ Accused No.2,
learned counsel representing for the unofficial respondent No.2 (defacto-complainant) and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State present. Today, when the matter is taken up, the petitioner respondent herein are present before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhaar Cards proof of their identity.
Learned counsel for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and the learned counsel for the 2"^ respondent have identified both the parties in the open Court.
2.
3. nd herein/Accused No.2 and 2 in
3 This Court has questioned 2"'"^ respondent herein/c/e facto complainant with regard to compromise, and she categorically stated to that extent that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioner herein/Accused No.2. This Court
4. is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. In view of the compromise between the parties, the chances of conviction are remote and bleak. In the light of judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & another^ quashing of criminal case, when the parties entered into
5. on settlement and compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the case proceedings in C.C.No.11 of 2023 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise, Guntur Guntur District, against the petitioner herein/Accused No.2 is hereby quashed.
6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 and Criminal Petition No.1230 of 2023 are allowed. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any. pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. T 2012(9) Scale 257 SD/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// section officer To,
1. The Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Excise Guntur, Guntur District.
2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Guntur.
3. One CC to Sri S Dilip Jaya Ram, Advocate [OPUC;
4. One CC to Sri M. Ratan Mohan, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
6. Three CD Copies sree
0^ HIGH COURT DATED:08/01/2025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2024 IN/AND CRLP.No.1230 of 2023 of I 2 9 JAN 2025 CO O^ . Current Section °6SPATCygg<^ ALLOWING THE I.A.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2024 AND ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION