RSA-1332- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 Balwinder Kaur and another Sohan Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. against the whereby the suit dismissed. 2. hearing 14.01.2025 was passed 3. received which reads as follows: Appellants No. 1 and 2 Respondents No. 1 and 2 Respondent No. 3 -2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Balwinder Kaur and another Versus Sohan Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 against the concurrent judgment rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit for permanent injunction The matter pertains to the year 14.01.2025, when this case was listed was passed by this Court:- “The present matter pertains to the year 2010. Perusal of order sheets shows that none has appeared on behalf of the appellants on the last 5 dates of hearing i.e. 05.03.2018, 28.09.2018, 07.12.2018, 24.04.2023. Registry is directed to inform learned counsel for the appellants about the next date fixed in this case. List on 22.09.2025. Meanwhile, fresh notice be issued to the appellants for the date fixed. ” Pursuant thereto, office report received which reads as follows:- Appellants No. 1 and 2 Incomplete address. Respondents No. 1 and 2 Appeal dismissed against respondents vide order dated 1.5.2019. Respondent No. 3 Ex-parte vide IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1332-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 are in second appeal concurrent judgment rendered by both the Courts below for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs was The matter pertains to the year 2010 and on the last date of was listed for hearing, following order The present matter pertains to the year 2010. Perusal of order sheets shows that none has appeared on behalf of the appellants on the last 5 dates of hearing i.e. 05.03.2018, 28.09.2018, 07.12.2018, 01.05.2019 and Registry is directed to inform learned counsel for the about the next date fixed in this case. Meanwhile, fresh notice be issued to the appellants for Pursuant thereto, office report dated 20.09.2025 has been Incomplete address. Appeal dismissed against respondents vide 1.5.2019. parte vide order dated 8.9.11. second appeal concurrent judgment rendered by both the Courts below was on the last date of , following order Perusal of order sheets shows that none has appeared on behalf of the appellants on the last 5 dates of hearing i.e. 01.05.2019 and Registry is directed to inform learned counsel for the Meanwhile, fresh notice be issued to the appellants for .09.2025 has been Appeal dismissed against respondents vide RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.23 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1332- 4. the appellant due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of more than interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by contact their neither the appellant in pursuing the present matter 5. disposed of appropriate application within a period of reviving the same, if so, advised. 6. 22.09.2025 rishu -2010 (O&M) -2- In view of the aforesaid premise, appellants/their LRs, if any would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of more than 14 years, the appellant interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by their counsel or to engage a new counsel. neither the appellants/their LRs nor their counsel in pursuing the present matter. Be that as it may, the instant regular second appeal is disposed of, with liberty to the appellants or their LRs, if any appropriate application within a period of reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable In view of the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notices to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court the appellants or their LRs have lost interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by them to counsel or to engage a new counsel. It is, therefore, clear that counsel are seriously interested Be that as it may, the instant regular second appeal is or their LRs, if any, to move an appropriate application within a period of 06 weeks from today for Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court lost to clear that seriously interested Be that as it may, the instant regular second appeal is to move an from today for RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.23 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.