SARABJIT KAUR ALIAS SHABO AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/1530/2025 · 2026-07-07
Vikram Aggarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7494 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7494 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.1530 of 2025 Date of Decision:-07.07.2026
Sarabjit Kaur @ Shabo and others …..Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Meena, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. P.S. Kanwar, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in this petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the ‘BNSS’) is for quashing of FIR No.111 dated 03.07.2023 registered under Sections 326, 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC, at Police Station Sadar Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2.
2.
Vide order dated 01.04.2026, a coordinate Bench had directed the parties to appear before the Area Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise dated 02.01.2025.
3.
The Area Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
YAG DUTT 2026.07.08 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
CRM-M No.1530 of 2025 -2-
4.
Pursuant to the order dated 01.04.2026, the parties appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran, and as per the report dated 30.05.2026 submitted to this Court, both the parties got their respective statements recorded in Court.
5.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the BNSS can be exercised in such like situations in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the directions issued by the Court in “Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052” and “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543”.
6.
In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran, accompanied by statements of both the parties, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.111 dated 03.07.2023 registered under Sections 326, 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC, at Police Station Sadar Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 07, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.08 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.