Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74925 (KAR)

SMT SARASWTHAMMA v. SMT SUBBALAKSHMAMMA

RSA/1776/2023 · 2025-07-21

H P Sandesh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27186 RSA No. 1776 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1776 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SARASWTHAMMA W/O BALA ASHWATHAMMA D/O LATE ASHWATHAPPAA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT 37/3, KASTURI LAYOUT RAJAGOPALANAGARA, LAGGERE BENGALURU NORTH-560 058. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. LOURDU MARIYAPPA A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUBBALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 2. SRI. SHIVA S/O LATE SANJEEVPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. SRINIVASA S/O LATE SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT KONDAVAPALLI VILALGE Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27186 RSA No. 1776 of 2023 KASABA HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK-561 207. 5. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 6. SMT. GAYATHRI W/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE R/AT KONDAMAVARAPALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK-561 207. 7. SMT. MANJULA D/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA W/O SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT HOSAHUDYA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK-561 207. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.31/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.02.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.133/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPUR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27186 RSA No. 1776 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In terms of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19