Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74903 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA v. THE COMMISSIONER,

WP/35509/2024 · 2025-11-26

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49190 WP No. 35509 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.35509 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI AKASH V.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE ORDER OR DIRECTIONS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE LATEST REPRESENTATION DATED 28.10.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by C K LATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49190 WP No. 35509 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her representation dated 28.10.2024 vide Annexure-E. 2. Learned counsel for the BDA has filed statement of objections and has also produced the endorsement vide Annexure–R7 dated 09.09.2021 wherein it is stated that the petitioner’s representation has already been considered and a reasoned order has been passed by the second respondent. 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner’s representation has been duly considered and an order has been passed, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. It is, however, made clear that, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it is always open - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49190 WP No. 35509 of 2024 to her to challenge the same in accordance with law, if so advised. SD/- ______________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36