Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 749 (PNJ)

KANWAR RAJA RAM v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP-PIL/100/2026 · 2026-04-18

Sanjiv Berry

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-PIL-100- 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kanwar Raja Ram State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. encroachment caused by respond municipal land in village Uchana, Tehsil and Distr 2 behalf of respondent No.2 Corporation has already issued notice way back on 26.08.2025 vide Annexure P-5. However, learned counse to inform this Court as to conclusion -2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kanwar Raja Ram Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Mr. Vaneet K. Sharma, Advocate (through video conferencing), for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) The grievance raised by way of this PIL is that there is encroachment caused by respondents No.4 to 7 by creating fis municipal land in village Uchana, Tehsil and Distr Shri Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, appearing on advance notice on behalf of respondent No.2 – Municipal Corporation, Karnal, states that the Corporation has already issued notice way back on 26.08.2025 vide Annexure 5. However, learned counsel for respondent No.2 to inform this Court as to whether the no . -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-PIL-100-2026 Date of decision : 18.04.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Vaneet K. Sharma, Advocate (through video conferencing), Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, ( Oral ) The grievance raised by way of this PIL is that there is ents No.4 to 7 by creating fish pond over municipal land in village Uchana, Tehsil and District Karnal. Shri Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, appearing on advance notice on Municipal Corporation, Karnal, states that the Corporation has already issued notice way back on 26.08.2025 vide Annexure l for respondent No.2 – Corporation is not able otice has been brought to its log 2026 18.04.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents Vaneet K. Sharma, Advocate (through video conferencing), The grievance raised by way of this PIL is that there is pond over Shri Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, appearing on advance notice on Municipal Corporation, Karnal, states that the Corporation has already issued notice way back on 26.08.2025 vide Annexure Corporation is not able gical NAROTAM DASS 2026.04.18 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-PIL-100- 3. after afford be brought two months 4. April 18, 2026 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2026 The said notice appears to be still pending and ding due and sufficient opportun t to its logical end by passing a s. Accordingly, the petition stand 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- The said notice appears to be still pending and if that is so, t nity to the alleged encroachers, s a speaking order within a period ds disposed of. ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( SANJIV BERRY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No then same d of NAROTAM DASS 2026.04.18 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment