Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74888 (KAR)

THE PRESIDENT MADHUBAN BRINDAVAN APARTMENTS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION v. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S KIRLOSKAR INVESTMENTS AND FINANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)

CA/242/2024 · 2025-11-27

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49232 CA No. 242 of 2024 In CA No. 145 of 2024 In COP No. 2 of 2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2024 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 145 OF 2024 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 2 OF 2000 BETWEEN: THE PRESIDENT, MADHUBAN BRINDAVAN APARTMENTS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, NO.66/1,2,3,4 AUDUGODI, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560030. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. VENKATESHA T.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. KIRLOSKAR INVESTMENTS AND FINANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, "CORPORATE BHAVAN", 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. 2. SRI. NISHANT SINGH SHEKHAWAT, S/O. LATE SRI. D.S.SHEKHAWAT AND LATE SMT. MAGAN KANWAR R/O. FLAT NO.B-5, BRINDAVAN APARTMENTS, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49232 CA No. 242 of 2024 In CA No. 145 of 2024 In COP No. 2 of 2000 HOSUR ROAD, ADUGODI, BENGALURU-560030. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.KRUTHIKA RAGHAVAN., ADVOCATE FOR OL-R1; SRI. DUSHYANTH NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KARAN JOSEPH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 6 AND 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES 1959. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Venkatesh.T.S., counsel for the applicant, Smt.Krutika Raghavan., counsel for the official liquidator and Sri.Dushyanth Narayan., counsel on behalf of Sri.Karan Joseph., for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. 2. Sri.Venaktesh.T.S., counsel for the applicant submits that the application may be dismissed as not pressed. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about non pressing of the application. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the applicant is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49232 CA No. 242 of 2024 In CA No. 145 of 2024 In COP No. 2 of 2000 5. Resultantly, the C.A.No.242/2024 is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.:1 Sl No.: