BHARATBHUSHAN NATHURAMJI BUDHRAJA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPT/25/2025 · 2025-07-17
Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7488 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7488 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:33924
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 25 of 2025 Bharatbhushan Nathuramji Budhraja Proprietor Bharat Agency Having Its Address At Shree Geeta Timber Complex, Near Raipur Naka, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, 491441, Son Of Shri Nathuram Budharaja, Aged About 67 Years,
... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Commercial Tax-G S T, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - State Tax Officer Jurisdiction Rajnandgaon Durg Division Chhattisgarh Office Of Office Of State Tax Officer Jurisdiction Rajnandgaon Durg Division Chattisgarh, State/ut- Chhattisgarh 3 - State Tax Officer Rajnandgaon-Circle Ward- A Office Of The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Rajnandgaon Circle 4 - Assistant Commissioner State Tax, Rajnandgaon Circle Office Of Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Rajnandgaon Circle 5 - Commissioner State Tax, G S T Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 6 - Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax Raipur Office Of Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax, Raipur G S T Bhawan, Dhamtari Road Tikrapara, Raipur- 492001 (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Union Of India Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi
... Respondents. For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Advocate. For Res No.1 to 5 : Ms. Anuradha Jain, Panel Laywer. For Res No.6 : Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate. For Res No.7 : None.
Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=CHATTISGARH, c=IN Date: 2025.07.18 16:48:37 +0530
2 SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order
on Board
18.07.2025
1. The petitioner has filed an application for withdrawal of present petition (IA No.2/2025).
2. Learned counsel for the respondents would not oppose the prayer for withdrawal of the petition.
3. Considering the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Accordingly, IA No.2 is disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay