2025:UHC:8258 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/940/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Akshay Joshi & Mr. Vishwast Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 4. Petitioner participated in a selection for the post of Foreman Instructor held by Uttarakhand Public Service Commission. Petitioner was declared successful in the written examination. The selecting body issued an Office Memorandum on 27.05.2025 requiring all the candidates to produce the certificate indicating that the institute where the candidate concerned has served and obtained experience certificate, is registered with any Government Agency and fifteen days time was given to each candidate for this purpose. 5. Petitioner challenged the said Office Memorandum on the ground that the rules of the game cannot be changed midway, as earlier there was no such condition mentioned in the advertisement. 6. A coordinate Bench vide an order dated 10.06.2025 directed for extending the fifteen days period mentioned in the Office Memorandum dated 27.05.2025 to 2025:UHC:8258 thirty days. 7. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel appearing for the Selecting Body submits that in terms of the order dated 10.06.2025 passed by coordinate Bench, the time available to all candidates was increased from fifteen days to thirty days vide notification dated 18.06.2025. By referring to averment made in paragraph no. 9 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2, Mr. Miglani submits that petitioner along with other candidates have already submitted the document in support of their claim for experience. 8. Since the time, originally granted by Selecting Body was extended by coordinate Bench and petitioner has also furnished the requisite document in the office of Selecting Body, as stated in paragraph no. 9 of the counter affidavit, the relief as claimed in this petition do not survive. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.09.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f 487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A10381 9DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE 5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.09.16 18:38:56 +05'30'