1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA & SMT.VIDYA SELVAMONY, MEMBER R.F.A.No.1238/2020 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.7159/2025) BETWEEN: 1 . SMT QHAMAR SULTANA D/O LATE RAHAMANI ABDUL GAFFOOR @ CHOTU SAB, W/O MR.KHAWAJA ZULFIQHAR AHMED, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.4, L NO.6TH STREET FORMERLY KNOWN AS O.P.H ROAD, JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560051. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIGHNESHWAR S SHASTRI, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: 1 . SRI SADIQ-UR-RAHAMAN S/O LATE RAHAMANI ABDUL GAFFOOR @ CHOTU SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, L NO.6TH STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS O.P.H.ROAD, JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560051. 2 . SRI. ABDUL RAHAMAN S/O LATE RAHAMANI ABDUL GAFFOOR @ CHOTU SAB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, L NO.6TH STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS O.P.H.ROAD, JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560051. 3 . SRI. AZEEZUR-RAHAMAN S/O LATE RAHAMANI ABDUL GAFFOOR @ CHOTU SAB, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, L NO.6TH STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS O.P.H.ROAD, JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560051. 4 . SRI. SHAFEEQ-UR-RAHAMAN S/O LATE RAHAMANI ABDUL GAFFOOR @ CHOTU SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, L NO.6TH STREET, 3 FORMERLY KNOWN AS O.P.H.ROAD, JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560051. ...RESPONDENTS (BY.SRI SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.11.2019 PASSED IN OS No.29/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU CITY (CCH-No.25) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DIRECTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER A memo is filed by learned counsel for the appellant. Memo reads as under: “The Advocate for appellant on instructions from the appellant most humbly submits before this Hon’ble Court that the plaintiff/appellant is sister for 4 defendants/respondents not interested in continue the appeal proceedings against respondents. In view of the same, the above Regular First Appeal may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in view of justice and equity.” Since the appeal is being withdrawn, respondents have no objection. Accordingly, placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KAV