IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1550 of 2024 ------ Aklesh Uraon @ Akhilesh Uraon, aged about 28 years, son of Maheshwar Uraon, resident of Village- Sapahi, P.O. & P.S.- Ramna, Dist.-Garhwa (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Panti Devi, aged about 24 years, wife of Aklesh Uraon @ Akhilesh Uraon, daughter of Sumar Uraon, at present resident of Village-Kumba Khurd, P.O.-Mahdeiya, P.S.- Nagar Untari, Dist.-Garhwa (Jharkhand) … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.10 Dated- 22.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.660 of 2021 registered under sections 323/498A of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of D.P. Act. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the complainant has treated the complainant with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and because of marital discord, this false case has been foisted. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to resume conjugal life with the complainant-opposite party no.2, if and when the complainant-opposite party no.2 is ready and willing to resume conjugal life with the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.25,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa, in connection with Complaint Case No.660 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case with further condition that the petitioner will keep and maintain the opposite party no.2 with full dignity and honour as his lawful wife if and when the opposite party no.2 is ready and willing to resume conjugal life with the petitioner and will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-