Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74789 (BOM)

RADHABAI LAXMAN PATIL SINCE DEC THR HER LEGAL HEIR v. THE COLLECTOR AND LAND ACQUISITION AND ORS

WP/3628/2023 · 2025-12-15

Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

49-3628-2023-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3628 OF 2023 Radhabai Laxman Patil since deceased through her legal heir Janabai R. Harugale … Petitioner Versus The Collector and Land Acquisition & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Pradeep Dalvi a/w Priya Dalvi for the Petitioner. Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent - State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 15, 2025. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned AGP opposed the petition. 3. In view of the present facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing the petitioner, we are satisied that the respondent No.1 needs to decide the demand application dated 22nd November 2022 at Exh.A for allotment of 0.93 Ares land to the petitioner from the available Government land pool as demanded, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 12 weeks from 23rd December 2025. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.12.18 10:15:25 +0530 49-3628-2023-CWP=.doc 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, assures that petitioner shall remain present before the respondent No.1 along with copy of this order on 23rd December 2025. 5. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be granted to the petitioner to ile an application in the proper format. Liberty granted. If such an application is made, undoubtedly the respondent No.1 shall decide the application within the aforesaid period. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2