Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74788 (KAR)

GANGAMMA v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELE)

WP/3254/2025 · 2025-07-30

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29455 WP No. 3254 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3254 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: GANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS W/O NAGARAJU R/A SY.NO.44/3 OF NAGADEVANAHALLI, KENGERI HOBLI, GNANABHARATHI POST BENGALURU - 560 056 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHRUTHI S.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELE) C,O & M BENGALURU WEST CIRCLE, C.A SITE 5, W.O.C ROAD, 3RD STAGE BHEEMAJYOTHINAGAR HBCS LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 079 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) KENGERI DIVISION BESCOM BENGALURU - 3. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELEC.) BESCOM LTD SUB-DIVISION, RR LAYOUT NAGADEVANAHALLI BENGALOORU - 560 056 4. GURULINGAPPA S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/A NOT KNOW TO PETITIONER Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29455 WP No. 3254 of 2025 5. NEELAPPA S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/A NOT KNOW TO PETITIONER 6. PATTANA SHETTY S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/A NOT KNOW TO PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. CHENNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 (VK NOT FILED) SRI. SANTHOSHRAJ C DESHAMUKH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASH IMPUGNED LETTER BEARING NO. SAKAANIOE(V/K4/SAHA/(THAA)24-25 DT. 06/01/2025 AT ANNX-J. ISSUED BY R3. B) DIRECTING THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DT. 13/01/2025 (ANNX-K) AND RESTORE THE POWER CONNECTION TO HER PREMISES AT SY. NO. 44/3 OF NAGADEVANAHALLI, KENGERI HOBLI, GNANABHARATHI POST BENGALURU. AND ETC., THIS W.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29455 WP No. 3254 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo stating that petition has become infructuous. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Hence, petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. SD/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19