Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7478 (GAU)

SAURAV PRAN SHARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM ORS

I.A.(Civil)/416/2025 · 2025-02-13

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010030462025 2025:GAU-AS:1595 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/416/2025 SAURAV PRAN SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM ORS 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 4:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : IMSENKALA, MS. B CHOWDHURY,MR S DUTTA,MR A CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, EXCISE DEPTT. Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/561/2025 SAURAV PRAN SHARMA S/O- SURESH CH SHARMA R/O- BARPETA ROAD RAMKRISHNA CENTRE ROAD P.S.- BARPETA ROAD DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM-781315 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP. BY 6THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ------------ Advocate for : IMSENKALA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 14.02.2025 Heard Ms. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam representing the State respondents. This application is filed praying for correction of typographical error in the order dated 07.02.2025 passed in the batch of writ petitions being WP(C)/532/2025 & Ors. The show cause notice dated 18.11.2024 at paragraphs 2, 3, 9, 11 and 12 of the said order dated 07.02.2025, ought to have been “18.11.2023” instead of “18.11.2024”. Accordingly, the said typographical error is corrected by inserting the show cause notice dated 18.11.2023 in place of 18.11.2024. The order dated 07.02.2025 be read with the order passed today, and shall form a part of the order dated 07.02.2025 in the batch of writ petitions being WP(C)/532/2025 & Ors. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant