Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 224
Suba Singh
State of Punjab
CORAM: HO Present: Mr
Mr *** AMAN CHAUD
1.
Pra termination of Civil Services, appeal, he was s the Instructions
judgment in the S. Nagoor Me reviewed.
2.
Lea dated 17.07.201 was taken. Even upholding the c reinstated, copie
3.
Lea would not be av legal notice, kee
N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
CWP-297 Date of de
Versus
unjab and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. RK Arora, Advocate for the pe Mr. Sehajbir Singh Aulakh, AAG, P *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present peti n of petitioner by invoking the provis , based on conviction, the inquiry was stood acquitted vide judgment da tions dated 05.08.1998 (Annexur in the case Deputy Director of Colle r Meera, 1995(2) SCT 717, in su
Learned counsel for the petitioner s 07.2018 (Annexure P8) had been serv . Even in cases of employees who w the conviction, the matters have be , copies of such orders are Annexures Learned State counsel, on instructi t be averse to having a relook at the m keeping in view the Instructions an NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 29738-2018 (O&M) te of decision: 08.01.2025
..Petitioner
..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY the petitioner. AG, Punjab. t petition for quashing the order o provisions of Section 13 of the Punja nquiry was dispensed with. However, ent dated 14.05.2015, whereafter as p nexure P10) issued in terms of th Collegiate Edu. (Admn.), Madras v in such cases, the matter had to ioner submits that though a legal notic n served, however, no decision thereo who were released on probation whi ve been reviewed and they have bee xures P11 to P16 (except P14). structions, submits that the responden t the matter and take a decision on th ons and aforesaid facts, within a period
rder of Punjab ever, in as per of the dras vs. be notice thereon n while ve been ondents n on the riod ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.08 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-29738-2018 (O&M)
-2- of 4 months, after granting opportunity of hearing to petitioner which satisfies his
learned counsel.
4.
Disposed of accordingly.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 08.01.2025
JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable :
Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.08 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document