Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7477 (HP)

TEKI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7058/2025 · 2025-05-26

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 7058 & 7066/2025 Decided on: 26.05.2025 1. CWP No. 7058/2025 Teki …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 7066/2025 Lachhman …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Ms. Anu Minhas and Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Petitioners seek benefits of the decision rendered in Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. and others.2 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment in Satya Devi’s2 case has been assailed by the respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20496/2024. The common 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No. 2274 of 2021 and connected matters. decided on 28.05.2024 2 decision passed in several other matters connected with Satya Devi’s case has also been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal3. Copy of an order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 24.03.2025 in several connected Special Leave Petitions with lead case State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal3 was perused which reads as under:- “1. Delay condoned. 2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters. 3. Tag alongwith SLP© No. 20496/2024. 4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed.” In view of the fact that operation of impugned order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28.05.2024) in all connected Special Leave Petition has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction that benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner under Satya Devi’s2 case, shall abide by the outcome of the Inder Pal’s3 case instituted by the respondents against the common judgment rendered in Satya Devi’s2 case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 26th May, 2025(rohit) 3Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11306/2025