Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7475 (RAJ)

RAHUL JASWAL @ RAHUL RDX S/O RAJESH KUMAR JAYASWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2423/2025 · 2025-02-25

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8408] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2423/2025 Rahul Jaswal @ Rahul Rdx S/o Rajesh Kumar Jayaswal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o K.l. House Saithal Mod Dausa, Police Station Kotwali, District Dausa, Presently Tenant House No. 182/163, Pratap Nagar, Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. Mr. Surendra Kumar Patodia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/02/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No. 462/2024, registered at Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur (West), for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 140(3), 308(2), 119(1), 115(2) & 127(2) B.N.S. and under Section(s) 3/25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and he is behind the bars since 03.02.2025. Learned counsel further submits that there remains no controversy between the parties as they have amicably settled their dispute by way of compromise. An affidavit in this regard has also been submitted by the parties. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude. Till then further incarceration of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and [2025:RJ-JP:8408] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2423/2025] willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made herein-above. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and submits that the complainant has no objection if the bail application filed by the petitioner, is allowed and the petitioner is enlarged on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case more particularly the fact that the parties have settled their dispute by way of compromise but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely Rahul Jaswal @ Rahul Rdx S/o Rajesh Kumar Jayaswal, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /23