Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7474 (KAR)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. ARJUN

MSA/100117/2023 · 2025-01-16

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MSA NO 100117 OF 2023 BETWEEN 1 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KNNL, MBC DIVISION NO. 1, SEC NO. 60 , NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT TQ AND DIST BAGALKOT-587103 ...APPELLANTS (By Sri: K.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . ARJUN S/O HANAMAPPA HALAKI AGE. 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAXANATTI, TQ. MUDHOL AND DIST. BAGALKOT-587122 2 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, BAGALKOT DIST. BAGALKOT-587101 ... RESPONDENTS 2 MSA FILED U/SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.02.2023 PASSED IN LACA.NO 5024/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT TO SIT AT JAMKHANDI AT JAMKHANDI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFIED THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.03.2010 PASSED IN LAC NO.288/2006, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE(SR DN), JAMKHANDI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC.18(1) OF LA ACT. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following; O R D E R Three weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE Note: As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 27.02.2025, the Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at Sl. No. 1 to 10. Hence, this MSA No. 100117/2023 stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the court order dated 16.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:-rv C- By:-rv T- BY:-ran