Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74715 (ALL)

KUSUM DEVI v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9648/2025 · 2025-07-15

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115341 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9648 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kusum Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harsh Vardhan Gupta Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Suresh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.2&3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of madamus for directing the respondent no.2&3 to release the remaining pension as amount of Rs.7,20,000/- of 10 years of her husband (deceased Assistant Teacher Chandra Sekhar), in favour of the petitioner. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (c) Award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the for redressal of her grievances, the petitioner has made representation before the respondent no.2, but no decision has been taken till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within a time bound period. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and in case a fresh representation is given before the respondent no.2, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Basic Education Officer, Kaushambi raising all her grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad