Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74708 (PNJ)

JASBIR KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19389/2024 · 2025-01-07

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

! " #$% %&'(')*+ , #(-'./#0. %$'$')%. 1%.(0( 2$#$%0)3#-#)4$5%.( %(6)4%)$( ! "##"$%"&'&( ! !" # $ %& ' ! !" ( # $ % ' # $%"#)*+)"&'&, ) * !+ !" ,# $ & - . - ' - % / 01 !!* , 2!!* 3& . ' 014 Kanchan 2025.01.09 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment 5 6 - . 6 - ' - 73 6 0 ) 0 !8* !" -. / 0 -. 1 23 ! ! !9 % 5 ( ' 6 73 6 0 ) -.4 5 06!3 . ' !!* 6 ' : " ) ' 9 ) 6- 6 - . 14 ' : - 0 ) + . : ' ' . ' 6 : - - 73 6 0 ) -.4 5 06!3 ' . ' ; " 6 $ “24. Before parting with the case at hand, we must clarify the observations made vide the impugned order qua the Kanchan 2025.01.09 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment competency of the Tribunal to hand over possession of the property. In S. Vanitha (supra), this Court observed that Tribunals under the Act may order eviction if it is necessary and expedient to ensure the protection of the senior citizen. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Tribunals constituted under the Act, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 23, cannot order possession to be transferred. This would defeat the purpose and object of the Act, which is to provide speedy, simple and inexpensive remedies for the elderly.” * < ' ' * !+ !" ,# $ & - . - $ . . - 6 ' ' ( ' 73 6 0 ) -.4 5 06! 1 ' 6 ' - ' - ' 6 - ) ' . 6 ' 1 : ( = ' 6 8 6 - #)0#.7+8 , 222 kanchan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Kanchan 2025.01.09 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment