Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74705 (KAR)

MR TARUN KUMAR CHOUDHARY v. C R RANGANATH ARUN

WP/23790/2025 · 2025-08-07

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30680 WP No. 23790 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23790 OF 2025 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: MR TARUN KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O PARAMAKANTH CHOUDHARY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O AT 1386, NILAYA, 12TH CROSS, SHREE ANANTHA NAGARA PHASE NO.20, HUSKUR GATE HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE 560100. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MUDDURAJA N.,ADVOCATE) AND: C R RANGANATH ARUN S/O S CHIDAMBRAJ, R/O FLAT NO.3D, MAY FLOWER ANNAPOORNA APARTMENT 4TH STREET, K K PUDUR COIMBATORE 600038. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY ORDER AND SET ASIDE Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30680 WP No. 23790 of 2025 THE COGNIZANCE TAKEN AND SUMMONS AND NBW WARRANT ISSUED BY THE IV ADD DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BANGALURU URBAN BENGALURU AS PER ORDER DATED 20/09/2024 PASSED IN E A 66/2024 AGAINST THE PETITIONER WARRANT WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the process issued by the IV Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru Urban [for short, 'the Consumer Commission'] in Execution Application No.66/2024. The Consumer Commission, acting under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, has taken cognizance of the offence as is contemplated thereunder against the petitioner who is described as a Director of M/s. Aakruti Nirmiti Limited. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30680 WP No. 23790 of 2025 This Court must observe that the Execution Application No.66/2024 is filed for enforcement of the Order dated 11.12.2023 in CC No. 313/2022, where the petitioner is a respondent. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the Consumer Commission's impugned order, which is a consequential order, the petitioner must essentially avail remedy against the order dated 11.12.2023. With liberty in this regard, subject to all just exceptions, the petition stands disposed of. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-