Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74703 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH AND OTHERS v. ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

COCP/3121/2025 · 2025-09-30

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3121-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 1. COCP-3121-2025 Om Parkash and others ... Petitioners Versus Anurag Rastogi and others ... Respondents 2. COCP-3649-2025 Balwan Singh and others ... Petitioners Versus Anurag Rastogi and others ... Respondents 3. COCP-3652-2025 Bhim Singh and others ... Petitioners Versus Anurag Rastogi and others ... Respondents 4. COCP-2533-2025 Daya Kumar and another ... Petitioners Versus Pankaj Agarwal and another ... Respondents Date of decision : 30.09.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, AAG, Haryana. Davinder Kumar 2025.09.30 17:10 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment COCP-3121-2025 2 VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that with respect to 78 petitioners in the present four contempt petitions, the necessary approval has been given by the Accountant General on 23.09.2025 and the amount, if not released, would be released within a period of 10 days from today. It is further submitted that the amount including the arrears from the date when the stay order was granted would be released within a period of 10 days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, the present petitionS be disposed of but the respondents be bound by the statement made before this Court and in case the respondents back track from the said statement or the statement is found to be incorrect, then the petitioners be granted liberty to revive the present petitions. 3. In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. The respondents would be bound by the statement made before this Court. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 30, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.09.30 17:10 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment