Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74690 (KAR)

MRS AMREEN BANU v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/23514/2023 · 2025-10-09

E S Indiresh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39760 WP NO.23514 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.23514 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MRS. AMREEN BANU W/O MR. NAFEES BASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.309, 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, PILLANNA GARDEN, III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 045. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIVASTHAVA H.K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S AALA VENTURES LTD., HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT: NO.403, 3RD FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR P.O., BENGALURU - 560 043. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NAJMU HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04TH AUGUST, 2022 PASSED IN MISC.NO.54/2022 BY THE XCI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39760 WP NO.23514 OF 2023 JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES, BENGALURU (CCH-92), WHEREBY THE PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY HEREIN UNDER SECTION 5(2) OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004 CAME TO BE ALLOWED; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for seventh time for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20