HARNEK SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7146/2025 · 2025-07-07
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74685 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74685 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7146 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
117
Harnek Singh State of Punjab
Coram :
Present:
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)
1.
226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No. of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to
2.
are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to the photographs Annexure P 01.07.2025 (Annexure P
3.
4.
respondent-State.
5.
value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a 146-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harnek Singh and another
Versus State of Punjab and others
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. BPS Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 7 and their relatives.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to otographs evidencing their marriage are Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-7146-2025
Decided on:07.07.2025
...Petitioners
...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for 1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 7. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 7. Their marriage certificate and are on record as Annexures P-3 and . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated ) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a
...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They and and . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.07 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7146 direction to respondent no.2 Nagar to decide the representation (Annexure P them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived.
6.
the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.
July 07, 2025 vinod*
146-2025
direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District to decide the representation (Annexure P them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immun the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. July 07, 2025
Whether Speaking/Reasoned:
Whether Reportable:
- 2 - rintendent of Police, District SBS to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj)
Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES
NO/YES
SBS ) of the petitioners and grant ity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion
VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.07 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document