Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7468 (JHR)

BHAGWAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1535/2025 · 2025-03-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1535 of 2025 ------ Bhagwan Singh, aged about-65 years, S/o-Sukel Singh, Resident of Village-Sushila Niketan Radium Road Ranchi, P.O.-Radium Road, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.100 of 2024 registered under sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 11(1)(d)(e) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, under Section 4(B) of Bihar Jharkhand Prevention and Improvement of Animal Act and 12 of Jharkhand Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the Pickup Van bearing registration no.JH-01CT-1980 which was involved in transportation of bovine animals taken for slaughtering. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the anticipatory bail application, and the petitioner had no knowledge about his said vehicle being involved in any illegal activity. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.100 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/