Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7467 (GAU)

ON THE DETH OF SRI GANESH BHUYAN HIS LEGAL HEIR SMTI MINAKSHI BHUYAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/160/2025 · 2025-04-22

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010029662025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/160/2025 ON THE DETH OF SRI GANESH BHUYAN HIS LEGAL HEIR SMTI MINAKSHI BHUYAN WIFE OF LATE GANESH BARMAN, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF SORBHOG WARD NO 3 UNDER SORBHOG, POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP ASSAM, GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI, 2:SRI DIPAK KUAMR BAYAN S/O LATE DHIREN CHANDRA BAYAN R/O VILLAGE SORBHOG WARD NO.4 PS. SORBHOG DISTRICT BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : BISWAJIT TALUKDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 23.04.2025 Heard Mr. Z. Kamar, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. It is submitted that the appellant Ganesh Barman in the connected Criminal Appeal No. 323/2022 had expired while he was still in custody. Now, his wife Smti. Minakshi Bhuyan intends to contest the appeal filed by her deceased husband. Therefore, she submits that she should be impleaded in the said appeal in place of her deceased husband Ganesh Barman. After hearing the learned counsel for both the sides, prayer is allowed. The name of Smti. Minakshi Bhuyan shall be substituted in place of late Ganesh Barman in the title page of the Criminal Appeal No. 323/2022 as well as in the IA (Crl) 7725/2022. Registry shall do the necessary correction as directed. After making the correction, the appeal as well as the interlocutory application shall be listed for hearing. The IA(Crl) stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant