PRATIKSHA KUMARI @ PRATEEKSHA PAL AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1020/2025 · 2025-03-17
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38877 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1020 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pratiksha Kumari @ Prateeksha Pal And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suman,Vishal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. By bare perusal of the records, it appears that online application for seeking registration of their marriage, was applied by petitioners on dated 06.01.2025 and thereafter, no steps have been taken by petitioners for registration of the marriage in pursuance of online application preferred on dated 06.01.2025 and as such, no protection can be extended since no steps have been taken up by the alleged married couple to get their marriage registered in pursuance of online application preferred at their behest before the Registrar, Marriages.
4. In view thereof, present petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Vivek Kr. Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad