IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Case No.353 of 2024 Decided on: 7th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/s Dean Medical College & Anr. …..Petitioners Versus M/s Esteem Industries and Inc .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in the matter on 22.03.2025:- “During hearing of the case, it was noticed that instant petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, assails the award passed by the learned Arbitrator under the provisions of MSMED Act, 2006. Admittedly, provisions of Section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006 have not been complied with by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will deposit the amount in terms of Section 19 of the MSMED Act within two weeks. At his request, list immediately after two weeks.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the written instructions of the petitioners dated 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 04.04.2025, he is under instructions to withdraw the present objection petition instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Without venturing into the merits of the matter, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as sought for by learned counsel for the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 07, 2025 Judge Mukesh