Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74628 (KAR)

SRI HULLURAIAH v. SRI LAKSHMIPATHAIAH @ PUTTANNA

CRP/105/2019 · 2025-12-04

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50736 CRP No. 105 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 105 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI HULLURAIAH S/O LATE EARAMMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, WORKING AS S.D.A. AS SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICE, SIRA R/A C/O GURUMURTHY, KALIDASANAGAR, SIRA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT-577 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH S.B.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.C. SATHISH KUMAR (NOC)) AND: 1. SRI LAKSHMIPATHAIAH @ PUTTANNA S/O LATE CHIKKAPAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR TILES FACTORY KOTHI THOPU TUMKUR-572 201 2. SRI HULLURAIAH @ APPAJI S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR TILES FACTORY KOTHI THOPU TUMKUR-572 201 3. SMT NEELAMMA /O LATE PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR TILES FACTORY KOTHI THOPU TUMKUR-572 201 Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50736 CRP No. 105 of 2019 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.01.2019 PASSED IN MISC.NO.26/2017 (IN OS.NO.337/2007) ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM TUMAKURU ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF CPC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner had filed a memo dated 25.06.2024 seeking for dismissal of the Revision Petition as not pressed. Memo reads as under: "The counsel for the petitioner submit that the above Civil Revision Petition would go infructuous for the said proceedings in O.S.No.337/2007 was held further and thereon decreed the suit afresh on 22/02/2022. Hence, the counsel for the petitioner sought dismissal of the above Revision Petition as not pressed". 2. Memo is accepted. 3. Memo dated 25.06.2024 is dismissed as not pressed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50736 CRP No. 105 of 2019 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a fresh memo dated 04.12.2025 seeking to dismiss the petition. Memo reads as under: " The counsel for the petitioner submit that the above Civil Revision Petition would go infructuous for the said proceeding in O.S.No.337/2007 was held further and thereon decreed the suit afresh on 22.02.2022. Hence, the counsel for the petitioner sought dismissal of the above Revision Petition as not pressed in the ends of justice and equity." 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5