[2025:RJ-JP:9252] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2373/2025 Kapil Jindal S/o Dhanesh Chand Jindal, R/o Kabai, Police Station Nadbai, Presently Residing At Katra, Nadbai, Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagawat Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.454/2024 registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It has been alleged in the FIR that petitioner took money from the complainant to ensure government employment. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that 6 other cases have been registered against the petitioner and [2025:RJ-JP:9252] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2373/2025] he was falsely implicated in those cases. It is submitted that in three cases similar allegations were levelled against the petitioner and he has been granted benefit of bail in those cases by this Court as well as co-ordinate bench of this Court. Trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; in identical matters, benefit of bail has been granted to petitioner by this Court as well as co-ordinate bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Kapil Jindal S/o Dhanesh Jindal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates [2025:RJ-JP:9252] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2373/2025] of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/354