Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74602 (ALL)

AMARPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WPIL/1898/2025 · 2025-09-22

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1898 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 23, 2025 nd Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irshad Ahmad, Vijay Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K. Goyal, A.C.S.C. (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Amarpal .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NISITH DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad