JAHANARA BEGUM AND ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
MC/7/2025 · 2025-04-22
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7459 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7459 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010029622025
2025:GAU-AS:4849
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC 7/2025 JAHANARA BEGUM AND ORS WIFE OF LATE MANIK UDDIN AHMED @ MANIKUDDIN R/O VILLA NO.2 DOKANIA MOUZA PASCHIM BONGSHAR PS. HAJO DISTRICT KAMRUP(R) ASSAM 2: MD. AHMED ALI SON OF LATE HURMUZ ALI VILLAGE- NO. 2 DOKANIA MOUZA- PASCHIM BONGSHAR P.S. HAJO DISTRICT- KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM.
3: MD. FARMAN ALI S/O. LATE RAHMAN ALI @ RAHMAN VILLAGE NO. 2 DOKANIA MOUZA- PASCHIM BONGSHAR P.S. HAJO DISTRICT- KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM.
4: JOHURA KHATUN W/O RAHMAN ALI VILLAGE NO. 2 DOKANIA MOUZA- PASCHIM BONGSHAR P.S. HAJO DISTRICT- KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 5: MD. HAKKE ALI SON OF LATE SUKUR ALI @ BIDESHI VILLAGE- NO. 2 DOKANIA MOUZA- PASCHIM BONGSHAR P.S. HAJO DISTRICT- KAMRUP(RURAL) ASSAM.
6: MD CHAND MOHAMMAD ALI ALIAS CHAND ALI S/O ABBAS ALI R/O VILLA NO.2 DOKANIA MOUZA PASCHIM BONGSHAR PS. HAJO DISTRICT KAMRUP(R) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (R) AMINGAON GUWAHATI-31 PIN-001 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER HAJO REVENUE CIRCLE GUWAHATI. 78001 4:DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS ETC.
GOVT. OF ASSAM RUPNAGAR GUWAHATI-32 PIN-780016 ------------ Advocate for : M HOSSAIN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 23.04.2025
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. The present application is filed for recalling of the order dated 28.09.2023, passed in the connected writ petition being WP(C) No.2543/2018, whereby the writ petition was dismissed for non prosecution. Perused the pleadings made in paragraph Nos.14, 15 &
16. Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned state counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. J Handique, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3 submits that they have no instructions to object the restoration of this writ petition. Considering the matter in entirety and taking note of the explanations given in the aforesaid paragraphs, this court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to recall the order dated 28.09.2023. Ordered accordingly. Registry is to restore the writ petition to its original file and list the matter in the admission column on 29.05.2025. With the aforesaid, the interlocutory application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant