Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74580 (KAR)

M/S MEGHANA ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10533/2022 · 2025-12-09

Jyoti M

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51856 WP No. 10533 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 10533 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S MEGHANA ENTERPRISES, NO.302, NO.1, 3RD FLOOR, 4TH MAIN ROAD, KASTURIBAI NAGAR, ADYAR CHENNAI - 600020. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. KATTA CHITTI BABU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHIJEET S.K.RAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, NO.14, BHIKAIJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 066 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER /RECOVERY OFFICER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN NEW BLOCK NO.10, BEHIND INCOME TAX OFFICE, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580025. 3. THE RECOVERY OFFICER/REGIONAL P.F COMMISSIONER-II REGIONAL OFFICE, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51856 WP No. 10533 of 2022 BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, NEW BLOCK NO.10, BEHIND INCOME TAX OFFICE, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580025. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, INDIAN BANK, MRC NAGAR, RAJA ANNAMALAI PURAM, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU - 600028. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MADANAN PILLAI R., CGSC FOR R1; SRI. M.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; R4 - SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Abhijeet, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Madanan Pillai R., CGC for respondent No.1 and Sri.M.Pradeep for respondent Nos.2 and 3 appeared in person. 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51856 WP No. 10533 of 2022 3. When queried, he submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition. 4. The oral submission is placed on record. 5. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36